Unleashing the Power of Human-AI Teams: A Must-Read Guide for Enterprise Leaders

Introduction

‍

Generative AI (GenAI) has crossed the chasm. More than 75% of knowledge-workers now rely on GenAI weekly, yet many enterprises still see it as a personal productivity tool rather than a catalyst for new operating models.

‍

At TeamForm we keep the spotlight on teams — the atomic unit of value creation. The crucial question is therefore not “Which model should we buy?” but “How will our teams evolve as AI agents become active teammates?”

‍

Why Human-AI Teams?

‍

Technology never ships value on its own — teams do.

‍

And with the rapid adoption of AI in personal work, it’s now a leadership imperative to enable teams to be able to realise the potential value and benefits of how humans working with AI tools and agents, can deliver better outcomes together.

Over the last 18 months, three repeatable benefits have emerged wherever humans and AI are intetionally combined.

‍

Productivity That Scales Across the Enterprise

‍

Teams equipped with the right skills and AI tools routinely report 25% increase in developer speed. A Microsoft’s 2024 Work Lab survey of 31,000 knowledge-workers found that GenAI helps them save time (90%), focus on mission-critical work (85%), be more creative (84%), and enjoy work more (83%).

‍

The effect compounds: when equipped with the right tools, teams are now capable to do more with the capacity they have and extend their capabilities when they would otherwise be dependent on other teams - this leads to more actual work and less time on coordination.

‍

A Rapidly Expanding Innovation Surface

‍

Foundation model capabilities are doubling every few months. Activities that seemed impossible a quarter ago - auto-generating explainer videos from wire-frames, synthesising 500-page due-diligence packs in seconds - are now baseline.

‍

This rapid pace of innovation means that teams can easily add the expertise, capabilities, and skills they need to find new ways to solve problems and deliver customer value. In recent research from March 2025 titled The Cybernetic Teammate, in a controlled experiment of teams who use AI and not, they found: 

‍

‍“ Individuals with AI matched teh performance of teams without AI, demonstrating that AI can effectively replicate certain benefits of human collaboration."

‍

Higher Employee Engagement

‍

When AI takes on “calendar gravel” (status updates, formatting, copy-paste analysis) people regain time for more meaningful work. In that same research referenced above, they found: 

‍

"Professionals reported more positive emotions and fewer negative emotions when engaging with AI compared to working alone, matching the emotional benefits traditionally associated with human teamwork."

‍

The Rise of Agentic AI

‍

Most leaders know assistive AI — models that help humans complete tasks and answer questions. Agentic AI goes further: understands context, decides what to do, executes actions through toolchains/APIs, evaluates results, and iterates — often without human guidance

‍

What the Tech Can Do Today

‍

While Agentic AI leverages a lot of what's available in generative AI apps such as ChatGPT, they are more focused on mkaing decisions adn optimise independently towards achieving specific outcomes or objectives, such as maximising sales, customer satisfaction, or efficiency in business processes.

‍

Six-Month Horizon

‍

For now the technology is able to demonstrate multi-modal reasoning and extended context - but in the next 3-6 months, we should expect agents to be able to be embedded on teams, armed with the right context to work collaboratively with human teammates towards shared goals.

‍

Benefits of Adding Agents to Cross-functional Teams

‍

For now the technology is able to demonstrate multi-modal reasoning and extended context - but in the next 3-6 months, we should expect agents to be able to be embedded on teams, armed with the right context to work collaboratively with human teammates towards shared goals.

‍

• Skill Amplification. Agents supply niche expertise previously gated by scarce specialists. Expertise becomes more democratised, with less-experienced teammates being able to close the performance gap when given the right AI tools.
• Busting Silos. Teams working with AI propose more hybrid ideas that span across domains instead of more function-based ideas that focus on a specific boundary.
• Bottleneck Busting. Where human availability stalls throughput, agents step in, shortening lead-times and smoothing flow.
• Governance Gravity. Autonomy raises real-time risk - model hallcuinations, runaway spending on tools and agents - demanding lean guardrails and human "stop buttons".

‍

Current Limitations:

‍

• Hallucination & Drift. Without strict retrieval and validation, agents fabricate citations or wander off mission.
• Security Surface. Granting tool-use and write access expands the blast radius for abuse.
• Context Costs. Storing and refreshing relevant context remains expensive and latency-sensitive. Intentional socio-technical design-humans-in-the-loop, test suites, audit logs - is non-negotiable.

‍

What Human-AI Teams Could Look Like

‍

While most organisations have adopted cross-functional teams as the standard collaboration model for value delivery, what might human-AI teams look like in the future? 

While too early to have a clear view on specifics around how this might work, we believe that Human-AI teams will have these shared characteristics: 

From Static Squads to Adaptive Teams

‍

Having a static concept of a “team” being a single one-size-fits-all concept is less likely to be the norm. Instead, we believe teams will shift towards having a stable mission, but fluid membership. Teams should still own an experience end-to-end, but will likely be more flexible membership—enabling people to change the teams they work in over time—to adapt to changing needs over time.

Whilst you may want to exercise changes to team composition, you cannot do this at the detriment to the underlying products and services they are supporting.

‍

This means having a system of record in which teams and responsibilities are captured and maintained is critical: which teams are working on what, who owns different assets and capabilities, which teams need to collaborate with to learn, adopt or consume your products and services internally.

‍

On-demand AI Agent Capabilities

‍

One of the biggest unlocks Agentic AI offers is the ability to spin-up point-in-time agents — narrowly scoped, self-contained digital teammates that can be provisioned in minutes, embedded in a squad’s workflow for a specific sprint or even a single task, and then decommissioned once the need passes.

Because an agent’s “skillset” lives in its prompt stack, retrieval layer, and tool-permissions — not a full-time FTE contract — teams can access expertise that would normally be scarce, expensive, or slow to hire, without adding permanent head-count or long-tail maintenance costs.

‍

Imagine a team is seeking to localise a feature set in a different language. Instead of waiting in a queue to access the localisation teams support, the delivery team can pull on a Localisation agent — that’s been fine-tuned on brand voice, connected to the product repo — that quickly pulls in the UI copy and translates user workflows and updates the user interface. The localisation team still reviews the quality of the work, but they are no longer a dependency.

‍

Team Boundaries and Capability

‍

You might be familiar with John Cutler's work on the journey to product teams which shows the growing capabilities of a team as the team starts to take on more accountability with what it can do (typically this is about a team taking on more than a single type of work and expanding so that the product team is making its own decisions and talking to customers).

‍

With the advent of augmenting your team with agents, you are able to identify gaps in your teams' capabilities and expand them with AI agents e.g. writing a marketing press release, have an up-to-date API spec, write great documentation, publish release notes, analyse customer usage data, etc.

Most teams would love to be able to do this, and seldom have the capability or capacity. Identifying opportunities to augment the team, experimenting with new capabilities and being able to deliver more quickly will enable teams to multiply their productivity and value delivery.

‍

More Dynamic Cross-Team Interactions

‍

More adaptive team structures will also necessitate more dynamic cross-team interactions, either through collaboration, coordination or communication, with a preference for self-service options that enable teams composed of people and agents to deliver with fewer dependencies and hand-offs.

To accelerate delivery, teams will increasingly rely on self-service platforms for data, deploy, and observability. Dependency queues shrink; synchronous hand-offs make room for asynchronous API calls, including calls triggered by agents themselves.

‍

Preparing Your Organisation

‍

We believe AI transformations require a shift in mindset and approach.

‍

It starts with assessing your current transformation strategy and ensuring there's a crystal clear purpose and “why,” which is then shared and well understood by the rest of the organisation.

Transformations can not be viewed as a project; it now needs to be seen as a networked learning system.

‍

• Continuous discovery trumps annual strategy refreshes.
• Many small bets de-risk big leaps.
• Value streams anchor funding, measurement, and agent allocation.
• Communities of practice evolve norms faster than any centre of excellence.
• Move from big-bang transformation to relentless micro-experiments focused on customer pain-points, not abstract “AI strategy.”

‍

Thinking about the transformation through the lens of your products, services and capabilities – rather than having a singular “AI strategy” that focuses on the adoption of technology – will unlock teams to think about the customer problems, opportunities, and channels that are involved to deliver better outcomes.

Leadership Mindset Shifts

‍

Leadership’s first job is to unblock experimentation, not to blueprint perfection. While we’ve always known how important “servant leadership” is to high-performing teams, ruthlessly identifying blockers to flow becomes even more critical with the rise of Human-AI teams.

‍

Leaders also need to actively use, experiment and understand the technology. This is not something that “just” the people in teams get behind — it’s something the whole organisation will be impacted by and therefore, leaders need to understand implications across all levels of working, strategy, data, and decision-making.

‍

We coach executives to spend one hour a week in “AI immersion,” building prompts, testing agents, and asking: “How might this change our operating model?” Visible curiosity cascades safety to teams.

‍

Cultural Readiness

‍

Generative cultures prize learning over certainty and control. The organisations that thrive in the era of Human-AI teams will consistently exhibit:

‍

1. Learning velocity over efficiency worship.
2. Transparency about wins and weird failures.
3. Networks of practice that cross titles and time-zones.

‍

This technology is moving and changing faster than any other and there are no clear winners or best practices, so being open and adaptive to change and adapt as the technology does.

‍

AI Capabilities and Skills

‍

Given the emergent nature of Human-AI teamwork, organisations need to invest in experimenting across a broad range of functions, team types, and work types. AI tools can almost be seen as a commodity now — and by starting only in a small pocket of the organisation, you risk creating a group of “haves” and “have nots.”

‍

By withholding AI tools from your teams, you also risk creating severe disadvantages to your teams, as they will be unable to develop the necessary skills they need in the future to remain competitive.

Beyond basic AI competency, invest in systems thinking, value-stream mapping, A/B test design, causal inference, and socio-technical risk analysis. Everyone in the organisation will need to be a sense-maker as complexity grows.

‍

Flexible Org Design

‍

As the shape and pace of work changes, so too will the concepts around teams, roles, team composition, team size, and team interaction patterns. Teams will be able to do more with the capacity they have through new capabilities they can acquire.

‍

Visibility of teams, agents, work and strategy are more critical than ever, which will help unlock the capability to flexibly and more dynamically form the right teams to deliver better outcomes.

Borrow from Team Topologies: stream-aligned teams, platform teams, enabling teams, and safety teams that codify guardrails. Agent teams may surface as a fifth topology, offering reusable agent modules.

‍

Lean / Agile Governance

‍

Security, compliance, governance and risk are more important than ever – however the work and the role they play needs to also evolve.

‍

Long monolithic waterfall-esque processes that require Change Approval Boards that only run every 3 months are dead on arrival. Lightweight, nimble and data-driven guardrails are key here, which will make it easy to do the right thing in terms of data, reporting and compliance.

Concepts to leverage here: from BVSSH – the notion of safety teams – or in Team Topologies the notion of an enabling team come to mind. Teams who work to enable other teams to make it easier to do things within an organisation’s risk appetite with appropriate guardrails.

‍

Investment in Continuous Upskilling

‍

While getting the fundamental AI knowledge and skills are an important first step, investments in upskilling shouldn’t end there. A guiding principle here is to focus on upskilling, and not replacing your people.

‍

The organisations that actually take the time and enable teams to explore, experiment and share learnings both internally to your organisation but also externally will outpace the competition.

Too much is changing too rapidly for organisations to be totally insular, sharing practices and learning from others is a major unlock — so finding ways to do that are also ways to make you a more attractive employer and place to work.

‍

Data & Identity Foundations

Most organisations are working with limited data on their teams, skills, and agents right now. With a lack of visibility, how can you be confident that AI investments are actually returning positive ROI?

Organisations will need better data of their teams, work and strategy to make better decisions and to more fluidly allocate and form Human-AI teams as needs arise and change.

‍

Understanding the barriers and guardrails to give people and agents access to key data and context to make better, more informed decisions is key.

‍

Concepts like the democratisation of data such as the Data Mesh and the unbundling of your organisation’s architecture are ways to decouple people, teams and technology to be able to deliver value more quickly.

‍

What You Can Do Today

‍

01 – Map your organisation. Create visibility of your current teams, products, services, and AI tooling. This is where a team management platform like TeamForm can help create visibility.

‍

02 – Assess your current AI strategy and roadmap. Assess skills, data, tooling, and culture across the eight dimensions in the “Preparing Your Organisation” section.

‍

03 – Establish communities of practice (internal and external). Learning velocity is critical and people need both formal and informal ways to learn from others and stay ahead of the curve. It’s critical for leaders to actively participate and build their own understanding of how AI is impacting work and teams.

‍

04 – Spin up a portfolio of experiments. Assign cross-functional teams a 6-week window and set up clear success metrics. Communicate and share the results of these experiments for visibility.

‍

05 – Curate an experiment backlog. Frame problems as testable bets — “If we deploy a knowledge-agent, L2 resolution time will drop by 40%.” Measure results, and scale appropriately across other parts of the organisation.

‍

06 – Codify & share. Record architecture patterns, prompt libraries, and risk mitigations in the open.

‍

07 – Scale or sunset. If ROI > target, define guardrails and roll out platform-wide; if not, close the loop and share learnings.

‍

How TeamForm helps organisations make the shift to Human-AI teams

‍

TeamForm is the system of record that connects all of your teams and AI tools with your strategy and work so you can improve team performance.

‍

Design your organisation to be agent-ready: See your organisation as it is today to identify strategic opportunities for AI to safely integrate with your operating model and teams.

‍

Realise ROI from your AI investments: Get visibility of what tools and agents are supporting your teams so that you can measure the impact of your AI investments.

‍

Get the full picture of your Human-AI workforce: Visualise and manage your human-AI teams, across all people, skills, teams, strategy and finance.